In a significant stride for the field of rehabilitation medicine, a recent study published in the “Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation” journal has meticulously analyzed the structural validity of a widely recognized balance assessment tool, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), specifically within the context of individuals afflicted with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). Spinocerebellar ataxia encompasses a group of progressive neurodegenerative disorders that profoundly impinge upon coordination and balance, presenting substantial burdens in the realm of physical rehabilitation and quality of life.

The Importance of Validated Balance Testing in SCA

Balance and gait disturbances are hallmarks of SCA, necessitating the utilization of accurate and reliable assessment instruments to gauge postural instability and devise targeted intervention strategies. Effective balance assessment is crucial not only for tailoring individual rehabilitation plans but also for evaluating therapeutic outcomes.

Delving into the Mini-BESTest

The Mini-BESTest, conceived as a more concise version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), discerns four balance control systems: anticipatory, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait. This tool has been instrumental in delineating balance deficits across various neurological conditions.

Methodology of the Current Study

Authored by Miyata Kazuhiro and colleagues from the Department of Physical Therapy at Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Science, as well as other prestigious institutions in Japan, the study methodically examined structural validity via Rasch analysis. They investigated the Mini-BESTest’s category structure, unidimensionality (a measure of whether the test scores represent a single underlying trait), and measurement accuracy. A total of 65 patients with SCA, comprising 23 women and 42 men averaging 63.1 years in age, formed the dataset for this cross-sectional research.

Rasch Analysis: A Closer Look

Rasch analysis is a sophisticated statistical approach that transcends traditional measures by providing insights into how well test items conform to expected patterns of a construct being assessed—in this case, dynamic balance.

Results: Reliability and Validity Insights

The study revealed that the Mini-BESTest adequately satisfies category functioning conditions and showcases unidimensionality, with a commendable person separation reliability of 0.87, indicating high test-retest consistency. Notably, the person ability-item difficulty matching—which is a comparison between the difficulty of the test items and the ability of the individuals being assessed—was excellent. However, certain items reflected local dependence, suggesting that their responses may be correlated and not entirely independent. Moreover, item #1, “Sit to stand,” deviated from the model as an underfit—an indication that this item might not be perfectly aligned with other items in evaluating dynamic balance.

Interpreting Mini-BESTest Performance in SCA

The results propose that, while generally reliable and valid, cautious interpretation is warranted in administering the Mini-BESTest to patients with cerebellar ataxia. Specific items demonstrated variability in thresholds with potentially marginal sensitivity or exaggerated challenge for the tested cohort, underscoring nuances in how SCA impacts balance.

Implications for Rehabilitation in SCA

The elucidation of the Mini-BESTest’s psychometric properties within an SCA population heralds significant implications for clinical practice. It underscores the necessity for clinicians to be attuned to the detailed characteristics of the assessment tools they employ, facilitating more nuanced and effective rehabilitation approaches.


The study epitomizes methodological rigor in validating clinical assessment tools, offering a keystone for enhancing the accuracy of balance evaluation in SCA. Miyata Kazuhiro and the research team’s contribution lays a foundation for an increasingly individualized treatment paradigm in the rehabilitation of patients with SCA by affirming the Mini-BESTest, albeit with caveats that inform clinical discernment.


1. Miyata, K., Kondo, Y., Bando, K., Hara, T., & Takahashi, Y. (2024). Structural validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia: A Rasch analysis study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.12.015
2. Franchignoni, F., Horak, F., Godi, M., Nardone, A., & Giordano, A. (2010). Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: The Mini-BESTest. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(4), 323-331.
3. Ilg, W., Brötz, D., Burkard, S., Giese, M. A., Schöls, L., & Synofzik, M. (2014). Long-term effects of coordinative training in degenerative cerebellar disease. Movement Disorders, 29(14), 1821-1827.
4. Lin, J. H., & Hsu, M. J. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) in community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke. Physical Therapy, 94(4), 527-536.
5. Lee, K. C., Lee, J. S., Park, J. S., & Lee, S. K. (2019). The correlation between balance measured with a modified bathroom scale and falls and disability in the elderly. BioMed Research International, 2019, 8356077.


1. Mini-BESTest validity SCA
2. Balance assessment SCA
3. Rasch analysis rehabilitation
4. Spinocerebellar ataxia balance
5. Mini-BESTest psychometrics