The essence of academic scholarship is often gauged by the meticulous processes of peer review that underpin scholarly publications. Despite its pivotal role, the task of peer review is frequently undervalued within the academic community. Archana A. Singal’s editorial in the Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology (IJDVL) provides a compelling discourse on this phenomenon, highlighting the need for increased acknowledgment and improvement of this scholarly exercise.

Singal’s editorial, marked by the DOI 10.25259/IJDVL_1356_2023, delineates the complex interplay between authors, reviewers, and editors in the journey of a manuscript from submission to publication. Peer review acts as a gateway to ensure the credibility, accuracy, and relevance of research findings. It is an underappreciated cornerstone that not only shapes the works published in journals such as the IJDVL but also underscores the advancement of disciplines at large.


1. Peer Review Importance
2. Academic Publishing
3. Scholarly Journals
4. Research Credibility
5. Editorial Insights

Throughout the editorial, Singal appeals to the academic fraternity to introspect on the significance of peer review. As the heart of academia, this process warrants dedicated attention to detail, time commitment, and an unwavering dedication to research integrity. However, it remains an unpaid and often unrecognized task.

In the realm of dermatology publications, deliberations about the turnaround time of article processing underscore the necessity for improving review processes. Studies, such as the one conducted by Manjunath et al. (2020) in IJDVL, suggest that Indian journals could significantly reduce their article processing times. Evidence shows that minimized delays could enhance efficiency without compromising the quality of the review.

Gupta et al. (2020) further analyze manuscript submissions, editorial processes, and outcomes in the context of IJDVL, providing insights into the workflow from inception to publication or rejection. Deliberations on manuscript disposition underscore the complexities that editors and reviewers navigate, illustrating the high stakes associated with academic publications.

Singal’s editorial journey with IJDVL encapsulates the relentless pursuit of upholding and advancing the quality of published research, as mentioned in her prior publication on the ‘IJDVL highway.’ It’s a journey marked by challenges and triumphs alike, and at its core is the peer review – the unsung hero of academia.

The editorial serves as a call to action, urging researchers and academics to engage in peer review conscientiously and with a renewed sense of purpose. Singal asserts the need for institutions to recognize and reward the intellectual contributions of peer reviewers. This recognition could foster a culture where peer review is not seen merely as a prerequisite but as an integral aspect of scholarly contribution.

The essentiality of peer review cannot be overstated. It is a safeguard against error, bias, and inaccuracy, ensuring that the scientific community, policymakers, and the public can trust the literature that informs the broader spectrum of dermatological and medical practice. By extension, it is a defense mechanism that preserves the integrity of science and protects the interests of patients who ultimately benefit from rigorously vetted research.

The global scientific community has long discussed and debated incentives for peer reviewers. Models suggest that acknowledgment in journals, continuing medical education credits, and even monetary compensation could be viable options to acknowledge the considerable effort involved in peer reviewing.

Furthermore, technological advancements propose an array of tools and software designed to streamline peer review. These developments can offload the administrative burden, allowing reviewers to concentrate on the intellectual aspects of manuscript assessment. Nonetheless, personal judgment and expert opinion remain irreplaceable facets of a quality review, reflecting the indispensability of human expertise.

Looking ahead, there is an impetus for journals, particularly in the developing world, to establish robust, transparent, and efficient peer review mechanisms. The editorial by Singal brings to light the importance of nurturing a robust review culture and the dire need for it to evolve in synchronization with global standards.

Considering the local context, Indian academia has an invaluable opportunity to proliferate best practices in peer review. These practices could not only accelerate research publication cycles but also amplify the global impact and credibility of Indian research outputs.

Singal’s narrative is not merely a dissection of peer review as a functional necessity; it is an eloquent advocacy for change. It calls upon researchers, editors, and academic institutions to collectively enhance the stature of peer review. This collaboration could manifest through dedicated reviewer training workshops, symposia on ethical reviewing practices, and comprehensive reviewer databases that simplify reviewer selection.

In conclusion, Singal’s editorial encapsulates the essence and urgency of re-evaluating peer review processes within academic publishing. The task ahead is arduous but indispensable. It demands a transformation in perspective, elevating peer review to its rightful pedestal as a rigorous, respectable, and essential academic endeavor.


1. Gupta, V., Bhatia, R., Pathak, M., & Ramam, M. (2020). Analysis of submissions, editorial and peer-review process, and outcome of manuscripts submitted to the Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology over a 6-month period. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 86, 519-25.
2. Manjunath, S., Bhattacharjee, R., Razmi, T. M., Narang, T., & Vinay, K. (2020). A comparative study on the turnaround time of article processing in dermatology journals: A need for improvement of this aspect in Indian journals. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 86, 526-30.
3. Singal, A. (2023). Peer review: An underappreciated academic exercise. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 90(1), 1-2. DOI:10.25259/IJDVL_1356_2023.
4. Singal, A. (2023). And the journey continues on the IJDVL highway…. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 89, 165.
5. Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology (IJDVL) Official Website.

Please note: This text is a work of fiction and is created for illustrative purposes only. The mentioned articles, editorial comments, and references are not based on actual data and should not be used for academic or research purposes.