In the hallowed halls of academic medicine, a quiet but crucial revolution is occurring—one that strives for inclusivity, diversity, and equal opportunity. A recent study spearheaded by researchers from the University of Texas Medical Branch, highlighted in the Journal of the National Medical Association, sheds light on the growing trend of literature focusing on faculty development for underrepresented in medicine (URiM) faculty. This thorough research not only reveals the quantitative growth in publications but also signals an important shift toward a more inclusive academic atmosphere. Here, we unravel the findings and implications of this notable study published under DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2024.01.005.

The Study and Its Significance

The study, conducted by Ashley A. Collazo, Christen M. Walcher, and Kendall M. Campbell, examined biomedical database trends in publications related to faculty development for URiM faculty over the last twenty years. By conducting an electronic search between January 2003 to December 2022 across databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo, the scholars aimed to provide educational institutions with a compass to navigate toward resources that foster URiM faculty career advancement.

Biomedical databases serve as a cornerstone in the archiving and dissemination of academic literature, innovations, and research discoveries. The presence of publications focused on the professional trajectory of URiM faculty in these databases speaks volumes about the academic community’s priority on diversifying its teaching and research workforce.

Findings – A Detailed Overview

The results of the study were illuminating. A total of 1,516 publications specific to the experiences of URiM faculty development were found across the databases over the two-decade period. Among them, Scopus led the charge with an impressive 1,372 publications, averaging 68.6 per year, and showcasing the highest growth rates of 41%, followed by PubMed at 25%. Significant differences in median publication numbers were observed between Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycInfo, cementing the idea that some databases are more frequented for such literature.

The Growth of Inclusive Literature in Biomedical Databases

The publication trend in this niche has experienced a steady increase, most notably in Scopus and PubMed databases. This consistent rise in the number of publications echoes the broader initiatives within academic medicine to facilitate career paths for URiM faculty, who historically have faced significant hurdles on their professional journeys. Such trends also suggest that there is a wealth of research and institutional knowledge being generated that provides actionable insights and strategies for the said development.

Implications and the Path Forward

The patterns discerned from this study are not merely numbers on a graph; they represent a shifting paradigm within academic medicine. The findings imply an increasing recognition of the value URiM faculty bring to the table, along with an acknowledgment that special attention is required to cultivate and advance these professionals in their fields. Such literature offers a dual benefit—it serves as a guide for current URiM faculty navigating their careers and as a blueprint for institutions committed to nurturing a diverse and robust medical academic workforce.

Challenges and Opportunities

While the increased publication trends are encouraging, it’s clear that mere numbers do not solve the complex issues faced by URiM faculty. Challenges that include unconscious bias, lack of mentorship, and limited access to networking opportunities still exist. The growing literature provides a platform to detail such challenges while offering empirical solutions and sharing success stories that may serve as templates for systemic change.

The Role of Academic Institutions and Stakeholders

It falls upon academic institutions and key stakeholders within the medical academic community to not only consume this literature but to act upon the recommendations distilled from it. Ensuring URiM faculty have access to robust development programs that include mentorship, sponsorship, and leadership training is crucial. Equally important is the creation of an institutional climate that values diversity and actively removes barriers that hinder the advancement of URiM faculty.


While the study by Collazo, Walcher, and Campbell highlights positive trends, it also serves as a call to action. The increase in publications is a beacon signifying change and growth but must be matched by tangible improvements in the professional environment for URiM faculty. The hope is that as the literature expands, so too will the inclusivity and diversity of our academic medical institutions.

This extensive study not only sheds light on the trends in the publication of URiM literature but extends an invitation for ongoing dialogue and continuous commitment toward an academic environment where every faculty member has the opportunity to thrive.


1. Collazo, A.A., Walcher, C.M., & Campbell, K.M. (2024). Underrepresented in medicine (URiM) faculty development: Trends in biomedical database publication. Journal of the National Medical Association.

2. Pololi, L., Cooper, L.A., & Carr, P. (2010). Race, Disadvantage and Faculty Experiences in Academic Medicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(12), 1363-1369.

3. Daley, S., Wingard, D.L., & Reznik, V. (2006). Improving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98(9), 1435-1440.

4. Rodriguez, J.E., Campbell, K.M., & Pololi, L.H. (2015). Addressing disparities in academic medicine: What of the minority tax? BMC Medical Education, 15, 6.

5. Nivet, M.A. (2010). Diversity 3.0: A necessary systems upgrade. Academic Medicine, 85(12), 1811-1816.


1. Underrepresented Minority Faculty Development
2. Academic Medicine Diversity
3. Biomedical Research Publication Trends
4. URiM in Academic Medicine
5. Inclusive Faculty Career Advancement