As a dedication to the ethos of scientific accuracy and integrity, the esteemed journal “Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology” (CMGH) has issued an erratum for one of its previously published articles. The correction, referenced as DOI 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2023.11.010, underlines the journal’s staunch commitment to providing the scientific community with thoroughly vetted and accurate information.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2023.11.010


1. Original Article: “Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CMGH)” [Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;11(3):857-880 33161156] 2. Erratum Publication: “Correction.” [Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan 13; S2352-345X(23)00209-6] 3. NIH Principles and Guidelines for Reporting Preclinical Research: [] 4. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines: [] 5. World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies for Medical Journals: []


1. Erratum Publication
2. CMGH Journal Correction
3. Scientific Integrity in Publications
4. Preclinical Research
5. Publication Ethics

In the pursuit of scientific truth and advancement, the journal “Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology” (CMGH) stands out as an epitome of dedication and diligence. On January 14, 2024, CMGH continued its tradition of upholding the highest standards of scientific publication by issuing an erratum, numbered as S2352-345X(23)00209-6 and published on January 13, 2024, highlighting a commitment to transparency and precision in its contributions to the field of medical research.

This correction aims to clarify and amend an oversight in a manuscript initially released in the journal’s 2021 Volume 11, Issue 3, pages 857-880. The journal’s goal with this erratum is to address any inaccuracies that could potentially affect the interpretation of the research findings. The original article, bearing the PubMed Identification (PMID) 33161156, delved into the intricate realms of cellular and molecular biology as they pertain to diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and the liver.

The correction process involved is not a mere formality but a reaffirmation of the importance the journal places on the reliability of the data and conclusions presented within its pages. Such a commitment echoes the sentiments of the broader scientific community that understand minor errors can inadvertently lead to significant consequences in subsequent research and clinical applications, highlighting the earnest need to rectify any errors perceived post-publication.

Acknowledging the need for greater clarity, the publishers at CMGH have informed their readership in a timely and transparent manner. The correction does not imply that the research’s core findings are invalidated, rather, it is indicative of a meticulous post-publication review process that serves to strengthen the bonds of trust between the journal, its contributors, and its audience.

This correction exemplifies the adherence to the Principles and Guidelines for Reporting Preclinical Research endorsed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). These guidelines serve as a framework to enhance the reproducibility and transparency of research findings, ensuring that issues — should they arise — are addressed promptly and publicly.

Furthermore, the action by CMGH aligns with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and the recommendations provided by the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), which emphasize the importance of correction of the scientific record as an integral part of the publication process. These organizations advocate for a clear, consistent approach to the handling of errata, emphasizing that issuing a correction is instrumental in maintaining the veracity of the literature.

The scholarly world can view the move by the CMGH journal as an encouraging sign — a beacon of integrity in an age where the accuracy of information disseminates at unprecedented speeds. It underscores the notion that in the dynamic and ever-evolving narrative of scientific inquiry, commitment to correcting the course along the path of discovery is just as significant as the milestones achieved.

For the scientific community, the release of this erratum serves as a valuable teaching moment. It reinforces the idea that no research is immune to scrutiny and that the process of publication is ongoing and iterative. For early career researchers, it is a lesson in transparency and the unwavering pursuit of quality in academic writing.

Let us delve into how the correction process benefits the scientific community at large. Scientists rely heavily on published data to inform their experimental designs and hypotheses. An erratum ensures that their foundation rests on solid ground, reducing the chance of replicating an error and wasting valuable resources in the process. Additionally, by openly addressing such matters, scientific journals reaffirm their role as rigorous arbiters of quality, further bolstering the community’s confidence in published literature.

The correction notification in “Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology” is indeed a testament to the journal’s stringent publication standards that fortify scientific integrity. This transparent and accountable action taken by the editors is sure to reinforce the trust of the readers, contributors, and the academic community in the journal’s dedication to scientific accuracy and progress.

In closing, the resolution of such errata is not an end but a continuing journey towards the refinement of scientific discourse. By so doing, CMGH and equivalent journals ensure that the collective pursuit of knowledge remains unfettered by avoidable pitfalls and ever-cognizant of the necessity for meticulousness in sharing the fruits of scientific inquiry with the world.

The realm of cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology is a vast and intricate one, with research outcomes that have significant implications for the understanding and treatment of diseases. As research in this field progresses, the responsibility held by scientific publishers to ensure the dissemination of error-free and precise information becomes ever more paramount. CMGH has set an example for other journals to follow, embodying an unwavering stance towards the advancement of science through a foundation of trust and rigor.

For additional information regarding the erratum and the impacted research article, the full text can be accessed through the journal’s website or relevant scientific database repositories using the provided DOI and identification numbers.

In conclusion, this rectification serves as a subtle yet powerful reminder that in the grand tapestry of scientific knowledge, every thread must be woven with care, expertise, and the assurance that should any fray appear, it is addressed with swift and honest scholarship. It is through such diligence that the scientific community can continue to build upon a legacy of credibility and excellence.