The medical landscape continues to evolve with the integration of minimally invasive techniques altering the course of patient care and surgical outcomes. Of particular note is the application of laparoscopic approaches to colorectal surgeries, which have demonstrated considerable benefits with regard to postoperative recovery and morbidity rates. The Hartmann procedure, a mainstay surgical intervention for conditions such as severe diverticulitis, obstructions, and colorectal cancers, traditionally required a two-stage surgery with the second being a reversal to restore bowel continuity. This second stage, initially performed through open surgery, has historically been challenged by low reversal rates and significant postoperative complications. However, the feasiblity of performing laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal has recently been assessed in a retrospective study conducted by Gavrila Daniel et al. at the Fundeni Clinical Institute, General Surgery Department and published in “Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania: 1990)” journal. This breakthrough is noteworthy for its potential to transform patient outcomes and warrants a detailed analysis through this news article.


In the context of the study, researchers at Fundeni Clinical Institute conducted a meticulous review of their database, selecting cases where laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversals were performed. A total of nine cases were identified, with patients having a median age of 63 and a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 29. Notably, several individuals had previously undergone open Hartmann surgery. The laparoscopic reversal procedure, which involved the reconnection of the colon to the rectum, was meticulously scrutinized with regards to operative time, the requirement of ileostomy diversion, and incidence of anastomotic leakage.


The findings of the study are significant. An average operative time of 223 minutes was recorded, which falls within the respectable range for complex laparoscopic colorectal surgeries. Impressively, none of the cases reported necessitated the formation of an ileostomy diversion. This facet alone symbolizes a major stride in the field as it implies a direct transition to bowel continuity without the need for a temporary ostomy – a factor that substantially impacts patient quality of life. Furthermore, there was no incidence of anastomotic leakage reported in the study – a complication that can have grave implications for patient mortality and morbidity.


The encouraging results from the single-center experience studying laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversals provide grounds for optimism within the surgical community. The laparoscopic approach appears to be a viable alternative to traditional open surgery, with the added benefits of reduced trauma, lower infection rates, and quicker recovery times. Given the complexity of the procedure and the factors influencing successful outcomes, the surgical team’s experience and the patients’ characteristics emerge as critical aspects of this approach. The absence of anastomotic leakage, in particular, is a testament to the proficiency achievable with minimally invasive techniques. However, the study underscores the necessity for larger case series to confirm the superiority of this method conclusively.


In conclusion, laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal as executed by the Fundeni Clinical Institute exhibits significant promise in terms of enhancing postoperative results and potentially augmenting the reversal rate of the initial Hartmann’s procedure. This innovative method aligns perfectly with the overarching trend towards less invasive surgical techniques, fostering improved patient experiences and outcomes. While these preliminary findings are illuminating, they serve as a precursor for further research, which is imperative for establishing the laparoscopic approach as the new standard of care. The journey of laparoscopic surgery has reached an exciting juncture, with the potential to offer transformative benefits to patients undergoing colorectal surgery.


1. Laparoscopic Hartmann’s Reversal
2. Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery
3. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
4. Anastomotic Leak
5. Fundeni Clinical Institute

DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.2.284


1. Gavrila, D. D., Minciuna, C.-E., Tudor, S., Lacatus, M., & Vasilescu, C. (2019). Laparoscopic Hartmann’s Reversal: A Single Center Experience. Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania: 1990), 114(2), 284–289.

2. Vignali, A., Gianotti, L., Braga, M., Radaelli, G., Malvezzi, L., & Di Carlo, V. (2000). Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomosis dehiscence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 43(1), 76–82.

3. Fleshman, J., Sargent, D. J., Green, E., Anvari, M., Stryker, S. J., Beart Jr., R. W., … & Wexner, S. D. (2007). Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Annals of Surgery, 246(4), 655–662.

4. Heneghan, H. M., Martin, S. T., Kiran, R. P., Khoury, W., Stocchi, L., & Remzi, F. H. (2013). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for obese patients: decreased conversions with the hand-assisted technique. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 216(3), 397–405.

5. Bonjer, H. J., Deijen, C. L., Abis, G. A., Cuesta, M. A., van der Pas, M. H., de Lange-de Klerk, E. S., … & Haglind, E. (2015). A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(14), 1324–1332.